The collective statement of 31 Bitcoin Core programmers caused a global debate between bitcoiners after suggesting the approach to work in the operate of the Bitcoin network, due to the constant controversy regarding operate cases.
“This is not supporting or accepting the use of non -financial data, but he accepts that as a Bitcoin censorship resistant system, it can and will be used for cases of use, and not everyone agrees”, a statement of June 6 published on the Bitcoin Core website. he said.
Bitcoiners “can’t” place fines
The letter argued that Bitcoin (BTC) is a network “defined by users” and that its main colleagues “are unable” to authorize what software or rules want. It is in connection with the ongoing debate on the spam inscription in the Bitcoin network.
“For free to run any software is the main protection of the network against coercion,” he added.
While many bitcoiners supported the “ACK” commentary, others opposed.
The president, Samson Mow, criticized the tone of the letter on the same day. He he said“It’s not unfair to say” this is what it is now, it’s a pity. “
“Devs Bitcoin Core gradually change the network to allow spam, and now they seem to focus on removing barriers for spammers,” said MOW. “This statement is also inappropriate,” he added.
On May 8, Bitcoin Core developers decided to delete a long -lasting transaction data limit in the network update to enable larger data segments that some Bitcoiners saw as opening the door to non -financial use cases.
Howver, the founder of Casa, Jameson Race, defended the letter. Race he said“Core creators are a group that says that we cannot force anyone to run a code they do not like; here is our thinking about relay policy and network health.”
“When there was no coherent message and it was only a group of independent programmers making individual statements, Bitcoin Core was accused of” poor public relations, “LOPP said, adding:
“Now a joint statement is published, and people find reasons to cry about it.”
In the letter, programmers argued that it is better to have bitcoin nodes software “strive for a realistic concept of what they would end in the next block, instead of trying to intervene between transactions and miners’ creators in order to discourage activity, which is largely harmless at the technical level.” Added:
“Although we realize that this view is not widely kept by all users and programmers, our sincere belief is that it is in the best interest of Bitcoin and its users, and we hope that our users agree.”
Related: Is it up to USD 150,000 to USD 150,000 by the end of the year?
Bitcoiner Carl Horton he said“It is a bit of” coins “do not bite” bucket “or” store “or any general purpose data storage. It is “a peer for an electronic cash system”.
Meanwhile, the Bitcoin Core developer, Luke Dashjr, criticized the transaction relay policy’s goals presented in the statement. “The listed transactions of the transaction relay are basically bad”, Dashjr he said.
“Predicting what will be extracted is a centralizing goal. The expectation that spam will be extracted is a defeat. Helping spam propagation is harmful,” said Dashjr.
Developers have said that the main goals of the transaction relay are predicting what bitcoin transactions will be extracted, “accelerating blocks of blocks” for transactions that will be mined, and helping Bitcoin miners in learning the transaction of fees.
Warehouse: The Boomers house worth 79 USD is finally on board from Bitcoin
