Today at Crypto Bank Digital Anchorage is reportedly examined by the US Internal Security Department. Meanwhile, the general director of Mantra, John Mullin, denied the claims of the sale of confidential tokens by investors – including the Digital laser – before 90% of the OM disaster, despite the data on what he suggests differently. Mullin also pointed to a specific exchange that could contribute to the sudden fall of the token.

Anchorage Digital Face Scruty from the US Homeland Security – Report

El Dorado Task Force of the Internal Security Department of the Internal Department reportedly started investigating the Anchorage Digital Bank, a cryptocurrency company at Wall Street.

According to In the report of April 14, Barron members of the Task group contacted former employees of the company in recent weeks to examine its practices and principles. The report cites unidentified sources.

The reported probe of the homeland task group indicates international financial activities. Established in 1992, Task group El Dorado concentrates On the “transnational money laundering” and financial crimes carried out by organizations.

Anchorage is co -founded by the Portuguese entrepreneur Diogo Monica and Nathan McCouley, According to on your website. Together with American companies, Anchorage operates in Singapore and Portugal. His investors include Andreessen Horowitz, Goldman Sachs and Visa.

The General Director of the Mantra denies the Insider OM token Dump, says Arkham “incorrectly marked” wallets

The general director of Mantra, John Mullin, denied reports suggesting huge tokens transfers on huge -scale by the main mantra investors in the days preceding the violent fall of the OM token, while in AMA organized by CointeLraph on April 14.

“The Mantra Association, our key investors, our advisers – no one has sold, and we categorically deny, and we will provide verifiable evidence as proof that it is so”, Mullin It was found in Ama.

Previous reports suggest that the Digital Laser, a strategic mantra investor, paid huge parts of the mantra (OM) tokens before the cryptocurrency rolled up on April 13.

At least two portfolios related to Laser Digital were among 17 wallets, which moved a total of 43.6 million OM tokens – worth about $ 227 million at that time – for exchange before the disaster, the blockchain Analytics platform, informed on April 13, referring to Arkham intelligence.

The Digital Laser is a digital activity supported by Nomura. Business announced Strategic investment in Mantra in May 2024.

According to Arkham, one wallet with a digital laser had moved About 6.5 million OM tokens (at that time 41.6 million USD) to OKX in seven transactions from April 11.

The last registered transaction from the portfolio took place on April 11 around 22:00 UTC, a few days before the mantra crash, which took place on April 13 around 19:00 UTC, UTC, According to For data from Coingecko.

Another wallet sent About 2.2 million OM (worth $ 13 million) at Binance in a series of transfers from April 3.

The data also indicate that digital laser could begin to reduce their OM resources in February. Wallets related to the company apparently In 2023, they received a huge part of their OM company from the Crypto GSR trading company.

Digital laser later negative Reports accusing their involvement in OM variability, claiming that the canceled wallets did not belong to him.

Mantra claims that one exchange “in particular” could cause the collapse of the OM

The team behind the actual tokenized mantra of blockchain assets claims that the sudden 90% of the token token was caused by the exchange of forced closing positions without a notification, with currently one nameless exchange.

On April 13, the price of the mantra (OM) dropped from 6.30 to below 0.50 USD, quickly dropping over 90% from $ 6 billion in market capitalization.

“We have determined that OM market movements were caused by reckless forced closures initiated by centralized exchanges for OM’s account holders,” co -founder of Mantra John Mullin wrote In a statement of April 13 on the subject of X.

“The time and depth of the accident suggest that a very sudden closing of the account position has been initiated without a sufficient warning or notification,” he added.

Mullin he said User X, in which they believe that one exchange “in particular” was guilty, but said that they are still “thinking about the details”. He said to others that the centralized exchange was not binance.