The Coalition of Cryptographic Measurement Groups threw its weight for a federal lawsuit questioning the efforts of the US Department of Justice (Doj) in order to prosecute Open Source programmers under the provisions regarding the transfer of money.
Paradigm Kryptographic Investment Firma, The Def Education Fund, Blockchain Association, Crypto Council for Innovation and others filed Amicus on Monday, on Monday, supported by Michael Lewellen, a developer who built a report not related to DeFI insurance and plans to publicly free him.
Groups claim that the USA improperly uses the 1960 title of 18 of the US Code, the act originally intended for regulating unlicensed monetary transmission, by expanding it to programmers of decentralized software.
“The government actively chases many peer-to-peer cryptocurrency programmers […] Even if these programmers simply publish Open Source software, “he said.
Related: Signal signal Tornado Cash sanctions can be excluded from the Roman Storm process
Dojat hit for aiming at the cryptographic codes
Tiny criticizes the interpretation of “transferring money” by the state, they include programmers who write code for tools that others operate for independent transaction. He compares the approach to the prosecution of the pan manufacturer for what someone is cooking in it.
“According to his ordinary importance, § 1960 does not extend so far … You cannot” transfer “or” transfer “funds in someone without acceptance and resignation from care or control,” we read in miniature.
Tiny claims that the position took legal uncertainty, discouraging programmers from building tools that augment privacy or decentralized financial infrastructure.
The lobby group warned that if the legal environment does not change, innovations migrate offshore. “In the face of possible prosecution […] Peer-to-peer cryptocurrency transfer developers will decide to transfer offshore or stop creating their tools. “
This conclusion arises when the US continues cases such as the US against Storm and the US against Rodriguez, in which programmers behind the tools such as Tornado Cash, face criminal charges on the basis of the same act.
The cost called on the court to reject the application for release and permission to continue the case, claiming that only a declaration judgment can clarify the law and secure neutral US software.
Related: Open Source: Crypto debate is losing his soul?
Centrum Monet loses Tornado’s cash appeal
On Thursday, the US Court of eleventh circuit dismissed the Coin Center claim against the US Department in connection with the sanctions in 2022 in the Tornado Cash case.
The dismissal was created by means of a joint agreement between the Coin Center and the Treasure, effectively completing the legal challenge of Crypto Advocacy Group for the Office of Foreign Control of Asset Control.
The Center coins initially argued that the State Treasury had exceeded its legal authority, sanctioning wise contracts and related portfolio addresses. The lawsuit has followed a wider wave of legal challenges, including a raucous case supported by Coinbase on behalf of six Tornado Cash users.
Warehouse: High belief that ETH will augment by 160%, Sola’s sentiment: Trade secrets
