Long -term debate on the price of XRP prices is still a robust discussion. In a recent post on the Social Media Platform X, the Fintech Armando Pantoja analyst, argued that the concept of market capitalization limiting XRP to 1000 USD is essentially faulty. His comment appeared along with a brief video clip, in which he uses comparisons between cryptographic and early technology companies, such as Microsoft.

Why market capitalization does not limit technology

In your film Pantoja rejected this idea Among many investors, XRP market capitalization should be used as a immovable barrier compared to long -term prices of prices to a price level of 1000 USD. He noticed that although technical analysis may be useful in a brief period, it becomes less vital when assessing the potential of the token in the long run.

To direct his point home, from the early 1990s he referred to the hypothetical script, asking viewers to imagine those who doubted Microsoft’s development because of his market capitalization. Such logic, as he suggested, would miss the wave of mass adoption driven by Microsoft.

Pantja insisted that the apply of stock market valuation indicators to cryptography leads to misunderstandings, especially since tokens such as XRP are more similar to technology than companies. “Always a market cap is too high. What does it matter? It is a technology that will be accepted independently,” he said.

This means that XRP is expected to be in line with another trajectory, based more on the apply of the network, usability and long -term Integration with global systems. This, in turn, would escalate the demand for XRP and would cause its price to be barked to 1000 USD.

Community reactions: XRP is fighting with rush

It is effortless to indicate the mathematical implications of XRP reaching 1000 USD, a valuation that would put its capitalization in dozens of trillion. However, supporters like Pantoja counteracts that such thinking is based on obsolete comparisons.

In this connection, it is not surprising that Pantoji’s post resonated well in the XRP community, especially among those who believe that the token has much more space for development than the mainstream narratives allow. Nevertheless, the post also attracted dissidents of those who believe that the price projection may be too high.

Instead of focusing on circulating supply or numbers of market capitalization, Pantoja argued that the long -term XRP valuation would depend on the actual adoption of its basic technology. XRP, because of that Cases of cross -border applyIt will undoubtedly gain high adhesion among banks and institutionsEspecially after the SEC Ripple lawsuit.

Interestingly, the price of USD 1000 is a more general consensus among several other cryptographic analysts. Barric, cryptographic commentator, also published Social media platform X, that XRP has a clear path to the first transfer through USD 4, and then 10 to 20 USD, exceeds $ 100, and finally reach $ 1000. He describes it as a multi -stage trajectory based on institutional adoption and the role of XRP infrastructure in inter -level payments.

House Kwok, former analyst Goldman Sachs and co -founder of Easya, Forecast long -term goals Stretching up to $ 1000 by 2030, also making mass adoption. Anders, another supporter of XRP, also sailed 1000 USD as a possible long -term ceiling Compared to the Bitcoin potential, consisting in achieving the goal of $ 1 million.

A distinguished picture from Getty Images, chart from TradingView.com